include stubs in shared library#28897
Closed
jeroen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
jeroen:sharedfix
Closed
include stubs in shared library#28897jeroen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom jeroen:sharedfix
jeroen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
jeroen:sharedfix
Conversation
This is needed for external applications that link to shared libnode. Fixes #27431
Member
|
@nodejs/node-gyp |
Collaborator
Trott
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2019
Member
|
Landed in ed138ba |
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2019
This is needed for external applications that link to shared libnode. Fixes nodejs#27431 PR-URL: nodejs#28897 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
4 tasks
joyeecheung
added a commit
to joyeecheung/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2019
To build mkcodecache and mksnapshot (they are executables), we currently build libnode with unresolved symbols, then build the two exectuables with src/node_snapshot_stub.cc and src/node_code_cache_stub.cc. Each of them write a C++ file to disk when being run. We then use the generated C++ files & libnode (with unresolved symbols) to build the final Node executable. However, if libnode itself is the final product, then we should not build it with unresolved symbols. nodejs#28897 added the two stubs for the libnode target when the --shared configure option is used, but it did not get rid of the actions to build and run mksnapshot and mkcodecache for --shared, so I think to get it working we also need a patch to make sure --shared imply --without-node-code-cache and --without-node-snapshot, until we actually fix the TODO so that mksnapshot and mkcodecache do not use the libnode that way.
4 tasks
joyeecheung
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2019
To build mkcodecache and mksnapshot (they are executables), we currently build libnode with unresolved symbols, then build the two exectuables with src/node_snapshot_stub.cc and src/node_code_cache_stub.cc. Each of them write a C++ file to disk when being run. We then use the generated C++ files & libnode (with unresolved symbols) to build the final Node executable. However, if libnode itself is the final product, then we should not build it with unresolved symbols. #28897 added the two stubs for the libnode target when the --shared configure option is used, but it did not get rid of the actions to build and run mksnapshot and mkcodecache for --shared, so to get it working we also need a patch to make sure --shared imply --without-node-code-cache and --without-node-snapshot, until we actually fix the TODO so that mksnapshot and mkcodecache do not use the libnode that way. PR-URL: #30647 Refs: #28845 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BridgeAR
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2019
To build mkcodecache and mksnapshot (they are executables), we currently build libnode with unresolved symbols, then build the two exectuables with src/node_snapshot_stub.cc and src/node_code_cache_stub.cc. Each of them write a C++ file to disk when being run. We then use the generated C++ files & libnode (with unresolved symbols) to build the final Node executable. However, if libnode itself is the final product, then we should not build it with unresolved symbols. #28897 added the two stubs for the libnode target when the --shared configure option is used, but it did not get rid of the actions to build and run mksnapshot and mkcodecache for --shared, so to get it working we also need a patch to make sure --shared imply --without-node-code-cache and --without-node-snapshot, until we actually fix the TODO so that mksnapshot and mkcodecache do not use the libnode that way. PR-URL: #30647 Refs: #28845 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
To build mkcodecache and mksnapshot (they are executables), we currently build libnode with unresolved symbols, then build the two exectuables with src/node_snapshot_stub.cc and src/node_code_cache_stub.cc. Each of them write a C++ file to disk when being run. We then use the generated C++ files & libnode (with unresolved symbols) to build the final Node executable. However, if libnode itself is the final product, then we should not build it with unresolved symbols. #28897 added the two stubs for the libnode target when the --shared configure option is used, but it did not get rid of the actions to build and run mksnapshot and mkcodecache for --shared, so to get it working we also need a patch to make sure --shared imply --without-node-code-cache and --without-node-snapshot, until we actually fix the TODO so that mksnapshot and mkcodecache do not use the libnode that way. PR-URL: #30647 Refs: #28845 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
To build mkcodecache and mksnapshot (they are executables), we currently build libnode with unresolved symbols, then build the two exectuables with src/node_snapshot_stub.cc and src/node_code_cache_stub.cc. Each of them write a C++ file to disk when being run. We then use the generated C++ files & libnode (with unresolved symbols) to build the final Node executable. However, if libnode itself is the final product, then we should not build it with unresolved symbols. #28897 added the two stubs for the libnode target when the --shared configure option is used, but it did not get rid of the actions to build and run mksnapshot and mkcodecache for --shared, so to get it working we also need a patch to make sure --shared imply --without-node-code-cache and --without-node-snapshot, until we actually fix the TODO so that mksnapshot and mkcodecache do not use the libnode that way. PR-URL: #30647 Refs: #28845 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is needed for external applications to link to shared libnode. Fixes #27431
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes@refack does this seem OK?