tools: fix stability index generation#45346
Conversation
|
An alternative is in f747806. I'm not sure which one is easier to understand. (I mean, I think it's the one I wrote, but that's because I wrote it.) This looks good to me, though, and I suspect is the better fix. |
This PR changes the JSON output, because I don't think having line returns in there is helpful, and it can break stuff as shown in the other PR. We could also land both PRs if we keep this one focused on the JSON output and yours on the stability index table generation. (I think that regex of yours is not easier to understand than this PR, but I don't feel strongly either way). |
|
Fast-track has been requested by @Trott. Please 👍 to approve. |
|
Landed in 7e581c8 |
PR-URL: nodejs#45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #45346 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
No description provided.