fix(process): clarify error when process.cwd() fails due to missing d…

[carlos-menezes]

Closes #57045.

[juanarbol]

Hi, Carlos

Thank you so much for taking the time to open this pull request. I can see the effort and thought you’ve put into it.

Although this PR handles a extremely rare case, which is likely not gonna happen and, the current ENOENT error is informative enough. To keep things consistent for existing users, we try to avoid changing core behavior unless there's a strong, well-discussed reason to do so.

Also, as a note a-side, may be worth reading the contributing guidelines and/or take a low-hanging fruit.

[carlos-menezes]

@juanarbol thanks for the guidance. Feel free to close this PR in that case.

I assumed the issue linked in the PR was considered a low-hanging fruit contribution given it has the good first issue tag. What should I look for next time I decide to pick an issue up, i.e. what's doable or not?

[anonrig]

The error that's thrown already has an "ENOENT" error code. This shouldn't be necessary.

[Qard]

It does, but from the linked issue it is often non-obvious where the error actually came from. By applying this change it makes it clearer why this ENOENT error happened.